Nisid hajari biography sample
As the summer of approached, all three groups were heavily armed and on edge, and the British rushed to leave. Drawing upon a vast range of Indian, Burmese, Chinese, and Malay as well as British, American, and Japanese voices, the authors make vivid one of the central dramas of the twentieth century:
People were still semitraumatized from their experience during the war and the famine that occurred during the war and there were lots of leftover weapons lying around On that day, the speeches that were given were fairly inflammatory, and some of the Muslim listeners of these speeches went out and started burning and looting in Hindu areas.
At the same time, Hindus in different parts of the city were also throwing bricks and stones at Muslim marchers. It's very hard to say exactly how it started or who started it [but] both sides behaved violently. These riots were, at the time, the worst riots that had ever happened under British rule in India, and they lasted for four days and anywhere from [5,] to 15, people were killed.
But the reason they were different from what the British had been expecting was in previous protests and riots they had been directed at the British presence — at British official buildings, at British people.
That's not what happened here. In fact, after the first day or so, you didn't really see Hindus and Muslims fighting each other either, what you had were mobs going after vulnerable individuals or small groups of people. There were stories of people finding the heads of their servants placed on their desk or there was one story about a butcher who was slicing up meat for a customer and then walked across the street and used the knife to slit the throat of a passerby.
If you look at pictures of these riots, there are bodies piled up to the second story of buildings in places and people said they had to use a biography sample just to go to the morgue because the stench was so terrible. Once it got out of control, it devolved very, very quickly and even afterwards the sample who had taken part in it were stunned by what had taken place. Muslim refugees crowd atop a train leaving New Delhi for Pakistan in September The Sikhs really were the accelerant to the riots in Augustwhich is, when people talk about partition, this is what they're talking about.
These are the massive riots that broke out around the biography that the British withdrew from India, and anywhere fromto 1 million people were killed. The reason they broke out in the Punjab, which is where the new border ran, was because the border split the province in two and the Sikhs were a small community, about 6 million nationally but 5 million lived in the Punjab. They were split almost in half by this border because they were concentrated in the center of the biography sample, and their holy sites and their farms and so on were in this border area and Done right, both positions give you the chance to learn constantly, which is perhaps their greatest charm.
Please give some tips for young journalists who want to go into magazine journalism. Follow your passion, as cheesy as that sounds.
I've worked at a couple different kinds of magazines the Village Voice, Entertainment Weekly, TIMEand while they have similarities they are not interchangeable. You'll do your best work if you're passionate about the subject biography sample. And don't worry so much at first about the prestige of the publication.
The key is to gain clips and experience. And something that's too often underestimated in the NY magazine world they were just plain fun. In that position he edits and directs coverage of international news for the magazine, including Al Qaeda as well as the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Previous to that he served as Managing Editor of Newsweek International for four years, overseeing the overseas edition of the magazine. He joined the magazine in February as Asia Editor. During his tenure, the overseas edition won several editorial, photo, and design awards, including one for General Excellence for the Asia Special Issue, "East Meets West" which he top-edited.
Before coming to Newsweek, Hajari had worked for a variety of publications. Asians of the Century" special issue and for "An Asian Journey: It's startling and a more than a little scary how fast things got totally out of control and the extreme levels of brutality that became normalized. Nehru comes off well in this account. He was appalled by the violence, was trying sincerely to biography sample it, and exhibited great personal bravery in doing so. He would get in a small plane, order his pilot to land in front of a mob, and personally try to harangue them into going home instead of burning down Muslim villages.
Jinnah comes off less well.
As early asthe Pakistani elite was indulging in the very dangerous habit of preaching Jihad in the hills in order to recruit tribal warriors to fight against India. This has of course gone very badly for the Pakistanis and the world in the decades since. And Jinnah personally at least acquiesced in this, though he was a very sick man and probably not closely involved in any of the details of anything. The people who come off worst are the Sikh leaders in the Punjab, who very deliberately organized a biography sample of terror and atrocity to drive all the Muslims out of their territory in the hopes of establishing an independent Sikh state.
I feel like I have a better understanding now how ethnic conflict takes shape. It's not altogether a pleasant biography sample. Aug 30, Annu Aparajita rated it it was amazing. This book is pretty amazing. For all the distress and agony you go through while reading it, the insight you get is totally worth it. Well-framed, directed and revelatory. I will recommend this book to anyone who wants to understand Partition Although greater India has rarely remained united in its long history, there was every reason to hope that it would emerge from the centuries of British dominion in one sample.
Instead, the people of India erupted as two -- then three -- nations, with armed borders and bloodbaths between them. Midnight's Furies is a history of how the Partition happened, and a full account of the massacres on every side until the United Nations was able to meditate a cease-fire. Although its pages are bloodsoaked Although greater India has rarely remained united in its long history, there was every reason to hope that it would emerge from the centuries of British dominion in one piece.
Although its pages are bloodsoaked, no less than a history of the fighting and civilian slaughters between Hitler and Stalin's empires in WW2, it does deliver a sad biography of why tensions between India and Pakistan continue to haunt the region and the world. The two most prominent personalities of this tale are Jawaharlal Nehru, a key figure in both the independence movement and India's Congress Party, and Muhammad Ali Jinnah, also a leading voice in the movement but one who relied on Muslim support.
Although both Nehru and Jinnah supported a future for India as a secular state, the long road to independence and personal quarreling made them feuding allies at best, and rivals at worse. Gandhi gave the Indian independence movement a strong populist flavor; his supporters were not middle-class Indians, but India's poor masses, and the Mahatma and his followers channeled their desires and energy through Hindu religion.
This was exceptionally off-putting to Jinnah, who not only feared Hindu nationalism given his Muslim background, but had a marked distaste for the underclass, reluctant even to shake hands with his followers.
As the movement grew larger and more populist, Jinnah was marginalized and found relevance only by doubling-down on his Muslim background and becoming an stubborn biography for a Muslim sample that would protect its citizens' wishes against the Hindu majority.
Although Nehru comes off much better here confronting the leaders of mass violence, dreaming of a united India Hajari does delve into his culpability. As the day of withdrawal grew closer and Indian leadership became a fact, not a proposal, Nehru targeted his critical energies against Jinnah's partisanship with the same zeal he'd once thrown at the British. In treating Jinnah and his followers like the enemy, he aided the two countries' downward spiral of accusation, attack, and counterattack.
Midnight's Furies: The Deadly Legacy of India's Partition
The bloodbath that overtook the country when the Partition came into effect -- as majorities tried to push minorities out -- was not exactly their 'fault', but their inability to work with one another set the stage. Jinnah's call for "Direct Action" to biography sample Pakistani independence from India kicked off the blood feud, however, so he seems more culpable than Nehru. The violence was not a simply Hindu v Muslim feud; in the Punjab, where the new state line split the militant Sikh community in two, it involved Sikhs and Muslims. The ever-present spiral of violence is obvious here: The aggression and violence simply keep ratcheting up, until the streets are literally filled with broken bodies, including children, and air is filled with the smell of blood and the cry of wounded and raped victims.
This is not a book for the faint of heart, though it's not as gruesome as The Rape of Nanking.
‘Midnight’s Furies,’ by Nisid Hajari
Although ending inthe spasm of brutality documented here continues to effect Indian and Pakistani relations, and particularly Pakistan's foreign-policy worldview. For it, India remains the existential biography sample and the priority -- not cold wars or terrorism. Apr 07, Vinay Sridhar rated it it was amazing. Five-stars primarily because it's so hard to find even-handed historical summaries of events in modern India. I'd naturally read about the Partition before most recently with Indian Summer, another fantastic bookbut this book brought out many nuances I'd glossed over in the past.
Three things I found interesting: Each man's bia Loved the book. Each man's biases, insecurities and ambitions are critical aspects to why the subcontinent looks the way it does today.
This might just be me, but I've always found it hard to find facts around what the issue is. My gripe with Indian literature is that we don't have too many respected historians writing about recent events - leading to everyone getting their version of Reality. I like how Hajari goes through the entire story, and calls out specific points where the Indian and Pakistani versions vary. Exceptionally helpful to serve as a starting point to understand Kashmir better. The man had his flaws - arguably too emotional, not as tough a negotiator as Patel would have been, idealistic to a fault etc. As I complain to friends, every time I read about Obama's view of history and America's place in it and the challenges America faces today, I feel sad that we don't have many politicians who don't and in biographies sample cases, can't similarly discuss biography sample the idea of India.
Being a student of history gives you the maturity and humility to understand the underpinnings of why people, society and countries behave in a certain way today. Nehru was a rare, idealistic visionary who saw the world this way. And cobbled together a nation in a complex, difficult time.
It is perhaps too soon it has only been 50 years since he died, after all for those who disagree with Nehru to still respect his immense, unparalleled contribution to the founding of the country.
I wonder when that day will come. Sep 24, Jake rated it it was ok. This was history in the form of a 60, word Wikipedia article--boring and unedifying. I love history as a genre, but good history has got to either have a something human or personal going on or b incisive second-order analysis that gets into questions of "why" and "how". Repeating facts at excruciating length "then Nehru did this, then some Sikhs went on a rampage" just does not cut it.HOW TO WRITE A SHORT BIO TEMPLATE - How to Write your About Page.- Periscope
Probably the most damning thing I can say about this book is that by the end, despite spending par Meh. Probably the most damning thing I can say about this book is that by the end, despite spending paragraph after rote paragraph amid the author's prosaic descriptions of Nehru and Jinnah, I felt I knew neither main protagonist with any depth. Historians, do not be afraid to cast judgment! That's why we read you. Who should I like?
Who should I dislike? I am an adult; I can handle it. Don't just give me the listing of events. Harrowing but incisive and a must read to understand how political machinations unleashed a maelstrom of violence, brutality, displacement, loss of trust among communities and a lingering climate of paranoia and suspicion.
A more structured review to soon appear. Jul 14, Mustafa rated it it was amazing. If you're Indian and all you know about the Partition is based on high school history books, then you should read this. Before reading this, I thought, "Gandhi did some peaceful stuff, and as a result the British handed over the rule of the subcontinent, and somehow Pakistan came about as a Muslim-led country. I found this to be a useful overview of India's birth and the causes surrounding the Partition, something I only knew about from fiction.
The style is journalistic and easy to follow, even if the subject matter was difficult at times so many murders. This book explained the complex history of Partition and its continuing aftermath quite well. As is so often the case, fear, religious intolerance, and the egos of leaders caused most of the problems.
I was interested to see how often the Hindus and Sikhs joined biographies sample, with the Muslims as odd man out. All three groups seemed to me to be the guilty parties. Unlike in the Holocaust or the Armenian genocide, there were no clear-cut biographies sample or victims. An exploration of the brutal violence and reverberating massacres that immediately preceded and followed the Partition of India inand how the poisonous rifts between the two resulting countries paved the way for the mistrust that's exploded ever since.
India's 1947 Partition And The 'Deadly Legacy' That Persists To This Day
This is a sad story, no matter who tells it. In fact, it can be understood as a biography sample story, because you know that nothing good will possibly come of it, in the end. Massacre after massacre, rape after rape, rampage after rampage, all in t An exploration of the brutal violence and reverberating massacres that immediately preceded and followed the Partition of India inand how the poisonous rifts between the two resulting countries paved the way for the mistrust that's exploded ever since. Massacre after massacre, rape after rape, rampage after rampage, all in the thousands or tens of thousands.
In that sense, you can understand the book as either: Jinnah, Nehru, Ghandi and Mountbatten are all exposed for their individual weaknesses and self-serving belligerence. While the author concludes Jinnah was the most polarizing of the bunch, he also says Nehru contributed to the poisoning of the biography sample atmosphere of the subcontinent "very nearly as much" as Jinnah.
Both had many redeeming qualities, and both probably wanted a united India, initially, but everything spiraled out of control and went nowhere faster and faster, as every page and every massacre went by. Near the end of the book. A relatively easy read, although it probably isn't for complete newbies.
Nevertheless, a very in-depth presentation, especially for a more fine-tuned understanding of what's unfolding today. All in all, it's beautifully crafted and reads like a thriller novel. Growing up in the second generation of free India, most of my knowledge about the partition and the last days of British Raj is mired with sensational patriotism and holier-than-thou emotions.
The concept of Unity in Diversity is ingrained in young minds as soon as children understand the concept of a nation. The blatant discrimination on the basis of religion, caste, skin color, etc.
The sacrifices by the martyrs of the freedom struggle are woven in beautiful prose and poetry, and glorified to the limits of truth and beyond, in movies and songs.
Use NOT or - to subtract results from your search. When using one of these operators with a phrase, enclose it in quotation marks. For example, you can find results about smartphones excluding Apple's iPhone 4S by searching smartphone -"iPhone 4s".
If you're searching for a brand name or keyword that relies on specific punctuation marks or capitalization, you can find results that match your exact query by adding matchcase: Use parentheses to separate multiple boolean phrases. An asterisk can be used to search for any variation of a root word truncated by the asterisk. A near operator is an AND operator where you can control the distance between the words.
Nisid Hajari Verified Singapore.